It has been added in front of the async function name to make it clear that it is an asynchronous function. Also the description has been modified to make it clearer.

Thank you very much for the suggestion

Both the name and the description have been modified.

Thank you very much for the suggestion

Added the chai configuration. Thanks

Random transaction generation has been added to avoid all tests being run on the same data.

Thank you very much for the suggestion

Example code responses have been added in the description, and the relationship between each of the actions with the function has been added.

Thank you very much for the comment

Misleading initial code: amountPositiveTransactionsByDate is asynchronous, while others are synchronous. Asynchronous should be marked with async keyword.

The value for each of the groupings must be the total sum of the positive amounts transactions. A valid transaction is considered to be all those whose value of the amount is equal to or greater than zero

Then this should not be called positive amounts transactions, and the function name as well: "positive amounts" is contradictory with "equal to or greater than zero". This causes the expected result to contain entries with 0 amount.

chai.config.truncateThreshold should be set to 0 (otherwise we cannot see the transaction content in the failed assertion message).

Now the actual test just uses a fixed set of data for all the test cases (and expects a fixed value). This is unacceptable.

Hi again,

The actions to be performed are:

How? 4 different functions? a class? a single output of one function? The user should know upfront what they are actually facing, without needing to open the trainer. For the same reason, the description is currently lacking an example of ouput (at least one)

Cheers

Ah, that makes more sense

I created the solution description wrong. Fixed, it was the average per character. Thanks for the feedback

Solved, I have removed the call to a non-Codewars server/API.

I'm honestly perplexed how you're computing the average word count? None of the transactions have a word count over 50. How is the average 194?

Hi,

A kata cannot rely on a server/API of an user. What becomes your kata once your server is suppressed, in a bunch of years, when you're not an active user?

=> unpublishing.

Cheers