However, it's worth noting that this implementation iterates through the array three times in the best case (once for sum(), once for max(), and once for min()), which could be a consideration for very large arrays where performance is critical.Maybe your solution was even better in the end ;)

Don't feel dumb. It's true there are better solutions than others, but you should feel proud because you completed the challenge! One can improve with time! :)

Same lol

Mine's faster

You see, I originally used .count but couldn't get the code to work because it timed out. This is waaaay smarter than what I used.

the description made it sound waaay overcomplicated

oh shit didn't know this

Wow so simple. Makes me feel dumb for my solution

Agreed. This method is fine but I always find myself messing up with whitespaces and punctuation

Check for capital letters. Also make sure the length of your string output is correct.

How so? I just did it with 4 lines.