For starters: I don't find it more readable. Additionally: code formatted like that cannot be formatted easily using an IDE. When I would refactor the name of the remove char function to RemoveCharAt, I'd have to manually reformat that code to get everything aligned. No problem for a tiny kata, but bound to result in very ugly code in big projects.

When you've solved the kata, you can fork your solution and look at Preloaded. It's in there.

Already there

It's been two years. Probably not gonna happen, or it would have been resolved already. Closing.

Ok. I added a check for that to all translations. And even 1 solution became obsolete because of that. Thanks for your suggestion!

That's just a list comprehension, what's wrong with it :o?!

Done, let me know if it all looks right; cheers :)

Which language? I played with it as I usually do :)

Apparently it is not there: can you check again?

Thanks in advance for your kind effort :)

You haven't executed your closure yet, so at this state it's just a normal function object. Naturally, you can't access function private variables.

From a general point of view, incremental addition is also more efficient than many other operators, so I always try to go for it whenever it is possible ;)

Thanks for considering my work :)

This got me confused because I don't know if there is something wrong with my code or with the tests...