Oh man, this is a great looking solution.

yeah I forgot about the 10 minute thing too

This was an intriguing answer. Nice.

This is what my answer on Excel would look like.

(Before i got the hang of lookups/Match/etc...

Well don't I feel silly!

I almost tore my hair out on this one. Use similar to yours...without round. Fail 1.
ok, figure out it oculd be a rounding issue.
try again. Fail 1. but now its a different one.
wtf.
give up on using round function, and use int instead.

hey what do you know...

Old post, i kno, sorry

Isnt it cool that you can think of other ways of doing something other than just the available option already setup?

This helped...now the question is...

But why?

Glad im not the only one who went this route

This is so much neater than the pictures i drew... :)

Thank you for this.

first thing i actually did myself. yes its not great, but im happy. :)

Many thanks. If I understand correctly, the "Point" was a class, and "a" and "b" were therefore objects that could be ascribed attributes to. These attributes being values x, and y.
So my solution works, just not in this context.
As I am referencing the first and second values in an array/list, instead of calling the object and its attributes.