Approved by someone

resolving (and seehere)

I would suggest giving an appropriate class name for the Java version, for example - class TheaterSeating.
If you have a local collection of your own kata solutions (for example all solved kyu8), it comes into conflict with other code challenges where an author has declared the same name.

I would suggest giving an appropriate class name for the Java version, for example - class PixelArt.isDivisible(int, int).
If you have a local collection of your own kata solutions (for example all solved kyu8), it comes into conflict with other code challenges where an author has declared the same name.

I would suggest giving an appropriate class name for the Java version, for example - class IntReduce.
If you have a local collection of your own kata solutions (for example all solved kyu8), it comes into conflict with other code challenges where an author has declared the same name.

I would suggest giving an appropriate class name for the Java version, for example - class FeastOfBeasts.
If you have a local collection of your own kata solutions (for example all solved kyu8), it comes into conflict with other code challenges where an author has declared the same name.

Approved

Approved. Thanks ;-)

Approved. Thanks ;-)

Approved

;)

the 'randomInts' test has results which are only integers, while 'randomNums' has results which can have decimals.

Can you name an example, please?

Yes, because the Node class is already pre-defined. You don't need to redefine it.

This is not an issue, this is a question.

Why are your methods without generic types? You might have stray too far from the initial code.

Also, read the description. Node is a predefined class.