OP solved the kata
Sadly, the tests don't give any gratification for finding a way.
They only really give you reward for complying with the reference solution.
Which reads "1001" as ". ." rather than ".." which seems way more fitting the description of 2/3 part of series.
"1001"
". ."
".."
Works fine on my machine, could you explain the issue a bit further?
No need of kmeans.
?
Like Brainfuck, it should be ignored all characters except the language's.
Thanks for the edits.
Fixed the tests, now mutating the array should do nothing ;-)
I just tried a few solutions and all worked fine. Did you see that 961 guys passed the JS kata. Maybe you mutate the input?
You shouldn't mutate the input array ;-)
Duplicate issue
Original author here, your recollection is correct. TBH this kata has evolved way beyond what was once concieved. That's a good thing but, to a certain degree it also makes it a bit of a mishmash
that's because the original language is haskell, iirc
That comment is almost a spoiler :P
Loading collection data...
OP solved the kata
Sadly, the tests don't give any gratification for finding a way.
They only really give you reward for complying with the reference solution.
Which reads
"1001"
as". ."
rather than".."
which seems way more fitting the description of 2/3 part of series.Works fine on my machine, could you explain the issue a bit further?
No need of kmeans.
?
Like Brainfuck, it should be ignored all characters except the language's.
Thanks for the edits.
Fixed the tests, now mutating the array should do nothing ;-)
I just tried a few solutions and all worked fine. Did you see that 961 guys passed the JS kata. Maybe you mutate the input?
You shouldn't mutate the input array ;-)
Duplicate issue
Original author here, your recollection is correct. TBH this kata has evolved way beyond what was once concieved. That's a good thing but, to a certain degree it also makes it a bit of a mishmash
that's because the original language is haskell, iirc
That comment is almost a spoiler :P
Loading more items...