Ahhh okay, I thought you asked this question before completing the kata ^^

Well, I rewrote the random tests, so this answer is kind of an empty tautology (if I knew it's required I'd have added that to the random tests).

Nope based on the random tests

Thank you for your help and advices.
I will take note of it.

Do we need to handle url with no params?

Approved

I also slightly changed the random tests to give random amount of params.

;-)

Added :D

This is the second one that I have ever published. I am so sorry for the lack of random tests

Don't wait too long. While your kata is lacking random tests it will accumulate bad ratings, and people may or may not come back to change those ratings once you have implemented random tests. You really should have had them from the beginning. It was rather predictable that the issue would be raised, and it's as predictable that some people will rate the kata badly because of it. ( And aside from the lack of random tests, it's a nice little kata. I'd hate to see it fail because of something so simple and so predictable. )

Honest question, because I genuinely don't understand: what were you thinking, publishing a kata without random tests?

Yea, I will try to add that in soon

Needs random tests.

No worries, you just need to unpublish the kata so we'll have one less duplicate kata cluttering the beta list (and so that nobody will know you made a duplicate kata ;-)).

sounds like a good add on

I am so sorry for that. I came up with this random without aware of there is a codewar as the same out there. My first time ever makes a kata. My apology