guys like you makes me want to quit programming studying))

I totally agree, it's way too easy for 4 kyu.

Your solution should run in linear time (O(n)) to pass.

I've tried several (Javascript) solutions, including one-liners with .every() (which by iteslf is an expensive operation) to simple for-loops. All of them pass the initial test but then time-out. Even loading this board took somewhere between 10-15 seconds. My guess is that I need to try this out another time, or just move on to another kata and ignore this one...

This is too easy for 4kyu, it's more of a 6

thx, for some reason I missed that. Sorry for dumb question

see the documentation...? ;) It's just designed this way, that's all.

Thanks, I thing I got an idea!

nope you're not on the good path... It's all about the context... ;)

Hello, can I get a hint please? I tried to execute the function with exec/eval with mocked sys module, reading and changing code of the function with inspect and lot of other stuff ... nothing works. Am I at least on the correct thought train?

I recommend changing the message from "Function Random.random not using seed correctly. Changing seed wont make results same" to "Function Random.random not using seed correctly. Reseting seed won't make the results same". Changing makes me think you used different value

I found out this doesn't show to red users which have add turned off. I had to turn them on at it works! Thanks

This is just mad! :-) Python version works great. And the can() method bring me an idea for solution of another kata I was unable to solve.

In your profile,

Earn extra honor and gain new allies!
Honor is earned for each new codewarrior who joins.

LEARN MORE

Click LEARN MORE button, and there you go.