Oh, I made such a construction for a function, but it turns out there are so many very simple solutions in one line...

I guess I really should get some sleep...

The additional "x" is supposed to be there, you're the one that's not including it.

Haha! I see it. Thanks!

?? no

Test in the Go version reports a correct result as wrong.

Test Results:
Tests
Sample tests
With coefficient = 7, exponent = 8
Expected
    <string>: 56^7
to equal
    <string>: 56x^7

Rust translation

Nice

Found this enjoyable. Sneakily trickier than expected.

ฅ^•ﻌ•^ฅ >> https://www.codewars.com/kumite/66f81a343728bffb6e64c764?sel=66f81a343728bffb6e64c764

cant believe i just did calculus outside of calculus

Approved

T R A N S L A T E D A R T

check the solution

feel like this could be 8 kyu

Approved