Interesting, but time consuming I think!

beautiful and cool solution

This is a 2kyu kata, which means that the method chain is not good enough maybe(because it is so easy in many languages and dosen't match the meaning of the kata).

• no random tests
• no tests for characters other than ( and )
• no tests for edg cases (empty string, string without parentheses)
• solution should accept parameter by const reference

Check this:

https://github.com/codewars/codewars.com/wiki/List-of-Possible-Duplicate-Kata#fizzbuzz

Really?

Duplicate.

Rejected because it is important to emulate the Forth syntax as close as possible in this kata.

Ok, but I have not any previleges for deleting katas yet!

broken tests

There is!

Use spoiler flag please.

Really great and easy solution! I'm really disappointed that I can't say that this is and clever and pest practice one time!