What is actually happening here? How does negating a number result in a negative number less one? I can see that it works, but I'm not sure I understand?

classic

fixed for both

fork for C

(i dont know what was the intended range of the RNG)

C, C++ random tests:

Undefined behavior due to potential int overflow: (i * rand())

Undefined behavior due to strict aliasing rules: *((int *) &f).

NASM translation, please review :)

Looks like the test cases didn't cover this one ;)

Does it works with the following grid ?

1 1  4 4
4 4  1 1

1 1  4 4
4 4  1 1

Why is there so much empty space in the code part of the Description?

Shoulld use test.assert_approx_equals which is the same as margin.

Hello, i'm the creator of this Kata and this is actually my first one ever created.
Please let me know if you encounter any errors in my solution and if you think, that it was too hard or too easy for my suggested kyu
Thank You!