How does adding 0.01 improve rounding here? thanks.

This might be a very simple function, but it's basically unreadable. Makes maintaining a codebase a lot harder. Same function just with more descriptive variable names and a comment or two and you should be set.

Shorter does not always equal better.

Hint: dont waste your time on it

how stupid is this logic.
after 2 undo and 2 redo x should equal 50.
why it is not like this?

Im very new to javascript so my solution is terribly ugly compared to this. Can you explain how yours is working? I don't even know where to start.

How to round it in JS ??

Nice shortcut.

Readability left the chat 🤣
amazing job tho ಠ_ಠ

Holy moly O_o

Same for me

Very nice. Thanks for this, I did not know that (following is LLM generated):

You can use JavaScript’s default parameters to add extra functionality. In this case, the 4th argument, which would be the array, is ignored (_), and instead, a default value is calculated based on the 3rd argument (c % 2)

Finally there is smth outstanding

I think yes, it should be optimized a bit

Most users voted 6 kyu, and the remaining ones voted 4 kyu. Oh boy, a proper reference scale is nowhere to be seen.