Very clever, well played

gg man

You can always browse the reference source of .Net.

TIL what TIL stands for O_°

TIL that actually works o_O

There is a solution to every problem ;)

I started to think it was the using part that was the problem, but then I'd have no clue how to solve it :D

Thanks for fixing it!

One line check fixed. Now proper solutions will pass the kata.

I found out the issue. If your solution is "too good", it detects 0 instead 1 line. Make sure you don't use arrow notation => , but return instead.

I'm also getting this, even though I'm not using any local variables (one-line solution) :|

good jop

It depends... Nothing is completely the same.
Everything is relative

If there were additional conditions, there would be other requirements, other tests and another solution. If you have a "brilliant" idea, then make another kata and tests yourself.

I cannot agree it's the best practice and totally valid solution.
According to requirements we should return 1, 0, or -1. But 1 and True are not completely identical.

Just imagine that an output of the function is used later in such piece of code: str(same_case(a, b)).
str(True) is not the same as str(1).

It seems either requirements should be changed or tests should be updated