Hello, I think there is a anomaly on the test case

ooo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
--------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$-------------------$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
18 D 12 L 20 U 12 R 5

Indeed, the snake can turn around and grow as we have one space on the border, the head is never on the tail. it should be OK.
Why to expect ((0, 5), 67) and not ((0, 5), 0) as all moves were successful?

Hello,

I am not able to run the game

I am getting the error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "main.py", line 2, in
import codewars_test as test
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'codewars_test'

I can remove the error from the test ... but not from the validation

I have noticed the same problem .
I don't really understand it because in the test we have
test.assert_equals(valid_word(['code', 'wars'], 'code'), True)

Sorry I have a problem to understand the limit of 72 bits...
When I look at the diagram set as example with the text www.wikipedia.org. We can manage 17 characters and so the bits length is 4 + 8 (length) + 8 * 17 + 4 (Termination) = 152 bits.

How to we fill the gap between the end of the 72 bits and the error codes? is the 72 limit misleading? Do we need to add alternate 11101100 and 00010001 to fill the gap up to 152?

I have the same question .... We have the example combinations(2,1) -->(9,3)
In this configuration, we have all the points in a line but one ==> I don't see a way to have a quadrilaterals which is not a triangle + one point on one of the side. I think we need to take the name quadrilaterals in an extend way...

In the previous version, I was proposing a solution with global variable and ... some people were trying to use them. It was confusing. Now, everything is hidden in a class.

Dear reg123, I have modified the test case "Oh Oh Oh!" to make it more obvious

Have a look on your result of the test case "Non sumerian consonants". Indeed, sumerian doesn't have as many consonants as we need...

Hello,

I have added WOMAN in the test case for simple words. I've verified and we don't have an confusion possible WOMAN is 𒌑𒌋𒐑𒈠𒀭 and OOMAN is 𒀉𒐖𒀉𒈠𒀭.
With regards to "WOULD" and "VOULD", you need to have a look at your results on the test case "Non sumerian consonants", there is a trick

As it seems to be a problem for many ... I will just remove its definition.

To solve the puzzle, you should not only trust your IT skills but also look at context information. How is writing sumerian? Read the article again maybe.

I think it depends on your browser configuration unfortunately.

thanks a lot. To tell the truth, I did not know the struct library before and I felt stupid reading the others' answers!