thanks for your suggestion

This is too easy to be 3 kyu, knock it down to 4 or make just multiplying with carry not viable.

Love it

I just take my solution from wikipedia everytime i see a question like this

Damn, thought I was there,
then discovered input 12311133345899.
now need to rethink my core values

Updated test cases. Didn't do the PS, but recognize that it's a good suggestion. Marking resolved.

Nice! Resolving.

I haven't been on in some time. I have added some examples and my own brief description of what a pronic number is. Thanks for the suggestion. Let me know what you think.

Description should specify what a pronic number is.

Linking to an outside resource is not enough; a description should be more or less self-contained.

u forgot to close the suggestion

Approved, good job, well done.

oh sorry, i wasnt aware, the other is tagged "performance" as well

JS update fork

• Node v18 enabled
• Used chai for assertion
• Fixed an issue where the tests were vulnerable to input mutation

Well, you can pass the linked kata with an O(n^2) algorithm. In this one, you need O(n) to pass. So, this one is not really a duplicate.