I have the same issue in Ruby. Somehow very huge integers don't always match the ones expected in the random tests. I thought Ruby handled such integers internally.

Sorry folks! Will do. Thanks for the heads up.

(rather my english which is fancy french, I fear... XD )

Cool, french seems to be fancy english. XD

I can almost guess the meaning. :D

Salut les gars,

Normalement, on cause anglais, sur codewars... ;p Les infos que vous échangez ici peuvent intéresser d'autres utilisateurs aussi.

(et on pense au spoiler flag, aussi, parce que les messages sont visibles depuis la dashboard)

Hi guys,

Normally, one speaks in english here... ;p the information you exchange might be of interest to other users too.

(and one thinks about the spoiler flag too, 'cause those messages are visible from the dashboard)

Ok, done. Par contre je vois pas mal de propositions avec chunk, mais j'ai un peu de mal à piger comment ça marche.
Tous les éléments qui renvoient true à la condition donnée à chunk sont mergées ?

Je suis arrivé à beaucoup plus rapide du coup. Merci pour le conseil.

Thanks for your post!

Until now nobody complained but I added a note in the description, in the solution and in Sample Tests.

I am sorry but you have to think a bit:-) Most often clients are not perfectly clear about what they want. I can't give the details of the calculatons.
6294 guys passed the kata so one can think it is doable... Plus: you have passed with OCaml which is not frequent!