I'd try to reproduce it locally, at the very least you should be able to find out what inputs it happens for by printing (and flushing to ensure it isn't stuck in a buffer) and probably throw ASan or similar at it to see if it notices anything. Of course, it might be something unexpected going on in the test code that you can't reproduce yourself - for which I suppose very carefully finding out how your function should behave is a start.

When i run your code against the tests and print out the indata, it turns out it does happen for an obviously special test case, so there's a good chance you don't need to dig any further than that.

hello everyone! i'm newby in C and trying to solve this task, but failing in a random test: get SIGSEGV. what could be the reason? (code below)

Sort string1 based on the corresponding character's positioning in string2. So, a comes first followed by b, then n, so banana becomes aaabnn

Approved

python new test framework

CS: last testcase expects {"1":4,"5":1,"10":0,"25":1366087610} but should be { '1': 4, '5': 1, '10': 0, '25': 2397957838778 } as stated 9 years ago. Still applies.

Also no random tests and no sample tests.

Nice!

Retired.

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/148.
Please join the discussion to share your opinions, and help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

• No sample tests

• Ruby 3.0 should be enabled

• Desciption should be language-agnostic

Duplicate issue (no sample tests).

Test cases do not work, an Error have been raised or undefined "add" function used in TDD. Only "Attempt" test cases work, so at least this Kata is doable.

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/93 Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

1. There's no random tests
2. tests don't check that blocks was called at all, so just returning blocks works as well