Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Needs random tests
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
What about correcting your kata issue instead of solving a new one;-)? Isn't it the first task of an author?
Hi, can't see the new testcases, because cw doesn't update this code before i solved the kata (so my changed testcases work as before). What i can see is the error of your "submit testcases" as before. The following message appears, which is not an error produced by my code (returning an empty list displays same error, with hint of missing bracket):
Test Results:
[eval]:33
Test.assertSimilar(caesarPyramid("b difflz buufnqu up njnjd dbftbs pof uipvtboe"), 1, 1000, "This is not one of Caesar's commissioned pyramids"]);;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: missing ) after argument list
at Object.exports.runInThisContext (vm.js:53:16)
at Object. ([eval]-wrapper:6:22)
at
at node.js:328:29
at _combinedTickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:67:7)
at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:98:9)
Thank you for the feedback, I think I have resolved some of the issues you raised, except the no function name, I was unsure what you meant by this? PLease let me know what you think.
Normally i should mark different issues here;-)...
Static tests are wrong - for example no function name, switched letters in one case "hundedr", generally wrong tests (use Test.assertSimilar instead of Test.assertEquals). Submit tests don't work too because of code errors...
So nice idea of these combined and different tasks inside one kata, but at the moment bad implementation - sorry:-(...
I agree with that. A few random tests would be better to test if the solutions actually work
Thank you for your feedback, I will include that in the description.
Hi, you should specify some preconditions. Based on the tests:
cycles
contains more than one unique integer bigger than 0.Regards,
suic
Needs random testcases
I run the code and all the test cases pass, however, upon submission I recieve this error message: 'Value is not what was expected', any suggestions?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution