jajajaja good

spoiler flag... (messages are visible to anyone from their dashboard)

it's not a performance-wise solution

@BitemNet: use 3 opening backticks with the python language name like this:

```python

then put in the content (which will look like it's in a Python editor)
and finally follow this with another line having only 3 closing backticks

yes, it's totally wrong. I'm currently updating the kata...

I took the sample tests very literally and gave a solution for this erroneous case as well.
Your answer suggests that it was enough to skip the sample tests, right?

holy... This test is just totally wrong... (showing up only in the sample tests)

Thanks ;) How did you do that?

[46, 78, 574, '287', '3', '423', '69', 'Apple', 'Grape', 'Peach']
[46, 78, 574, '3', '69', '287', '423', 'Apple', 'Grape', 'Peach']

But can anyone explain how this solution passed this test instance?

test.assert_equals(db_sort(["Apple",46,"287",574,"Peach","3","69",78,"Grape","423"]),[46,78,574,"3","69","287","423","Apple","Grape","Peach"])

I had exactly the same solution and it failed on this case:

[46, 78, 574, '287', '3', '423', '69', 'Apple', 'Grape', 'Peach'] should equal [46, 78, 574, '3', '69', '287', '423', 'Apple', 'Grape', 'Peach']

This is a cool, solution. I am guessing i becomes n, and the iterate method returns the iterator, so it runs once and then adds the number to the array?