I was a fool for creating a new table lol

There's no way to reliably check for them without either some false negatives or some false positives, so we live with the latter.

Which is... not much of a problem anyway, you can always rename your variable to something which does not trigger the code content tests.

Looks like it's fixed?

How did you do it, please? (I think you use a mthod I do not know for now) :)

In python I'm already disabled all module imports. I think it much better than source code check.

named 'random1' cause a fail

I think it's ruby.

It seems all right now, thanks

Do you have any ideas how to disable Random in Java?

I don't know for ruby, but the python version works perfectly well. Read carefuly the description: you have function one_two (oneTwo for Java)

Also for the python one. I think this issue is in general.

Because there was an error in oneTwo function. Now it fixed. Try again

Fixed

The preloaded method oneTwo() actually returns the solution.

Sorry. I need to spend more time to review translations. I've fixed description and oneTwo in Java

The preloaded method oneTwo() actually returns the solution.

one_two_three': undefined method oneTwo' for main:Object (NoMethodError)
from block in <main>' from times'
from `'

The instructions give a function 'oneTwo' but this function does not exist in the Ruby version, the function is actually 'one_two' this is misleading.
Especially since "global" variables in Ruby should be prefixed with $ and this is not the case with this kata.

My solution was accepted without the use of the this function, because I saw no way to use this function until solving it and seeing the solutions that used the given function.

You can just pass oneTwo() and it passes...