I coulnd't reproduce the problem. The test solution expected [9, 0, 8, 0, 6, 6, 0, 3, 9, 0, 2, 6] when I tried.

I see the change. Thanks a lot.

It looks great! I'm wondering if we should generate more 0s in the arrays since now they are very sparse which may not cover some cases (like several 0s in a sequence). But it's already pretty good right now. How do I accept the change? Should I just re-publish it?

Thanks for the translation. Feel free to add more test cases as you see necessary.

resolved

withit56, thanks a lot for this suggestion. I love your example which is very illustrative.
I've updated my kata to 1. create alias between pairZeros and pairZeors; 2. adopt your example in the description.

Thank you for pointing it out. It's now fixed.