It is not mentioned that empty user names after trimming should be filtered.

Post deleted. Unsorted didn't occur to me :-)

Javascript
Excactly how are the entries to be sorted? I thought it was order id -> reverse alphabetical/ascii

I can't get past random - the entries there do not look sorted on order id. From my log :

to deeply equal [ [ '3v', 0 ],
  [ 'Hz', 74 ],
  [ 'q8$a4', 74 ],
  [ '^', 3 ],
  [ 'y', 3 ],
  [ ')d', 3 ],
  [ '9', 3 ],
  [ '3s', 65 ],
  [ '^M&^L', 65 ],
  [ 'W!', 65 ],
  [ 'x', 65 ],
  [ '4q(', 48 ],
  [ 'I', 48 ],
  [ 'KQ', 85 ],
  [ '$', 85 ],
  [ '4BC+', 85 ],
  [ '6W)M', 9 ],
  [ '@T', 8 ],
  [ 'K+0)', 8 ],
  [ '@W9', 57 ],
  [ '(J!@OT7XL', 57 ],
  [ 'w$GWu6', 7 ],
  [ '5Z', 7 ],
  [ 'Z!s', 7 ],
  [ 'dbJ', 85 ],
  [ '!Z', 14 ],

Name/id pairs should be tuples in the languages that have them (Python).

Thanks for the translation and sorry for the late response. Approved.

python translation:

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/5f8575e485311d002364a2a5?sel=5f8575e485311d002364a2a5

Well, there's your solution with ( well, partially ) Ramda.

I also voted my conscience, not because I dislike programming with restrictions - that's a matter of personal preference - but because you prohibit function() {} and () => {} syntax but not the Class and {} wrappers, which are just too thin for my liking. If you want to properly disallow function syntax, I think you have to disallow those as well ( which leaves pointfree programming as a solution ).

Just to be sure, pointless and pointfree are entirely different things.

I have not looked at the solutions and tests. Maybe I will yet. Or I might solve it after all ( it's not that I can't, I just don't enjoy programming with restrictions ).

Sorry for the bothering, but I've updated the kata so no eval mess needed anymore. The solution now can be sent in a 'normal' way.

Sorry for the bothering, but I've updated the kata so no eval mess needed anymore. The solution now can be sent in a 'normal' way.

Sorry for the bothering, but I've updated the kata so no eval mess needed anymore. The solution now can be sent in a 'normal' way.

@Blind4Basics I updated the kata, thanks. I didn't find any docs in the wiki about reading the solution, so implemented it by myself. So if anyone has enough permissions to view the kata's source, I would appreciate any feedback.

how else do I get user input? :)

by reading the solution file.

Thanks for the catch. Fixed.

Thanks for the feedback! Sorry if you were annoyed with the eval mess, but how else do I get user input? :)
I disagree that this is pointless. While solving this kata, the competitor learns some interesting and useful concepts and language features (have you seen the original solution?).

I would be glad to see some solution with ramda import, if it passes the tests — then it is valid.