Sometimes the descriptions can be overworded or underworded. Information theory and the beginning of words is a very cool subject to research if you can. If you see kata with bad descriptions, you can leave a suggestion in the discussion section to help improve the understanding of the goal for other Code Warriors.

made me realize this kata is overworded

Hehe calculus programming ^-^

That's cool; let me know if you need a hand with refactoring or the like :)

Thanks! Yep, I have too many useState calls because I struggled with useEffect at first. I learned a lot of things from this.

Print the input (hoping you are not modifying it) and the expected solution to debug.

That's great (although you might be using a few too many hooks) - demo added to the description with credits :)

'Mitochondria' is spelled with an extra 'c' in the description example: // => "The Mictochondria

['R', 't', 'a', 'e'],
['a', 'e', 'r', 'v'],
['n', 's', 'e', 'i'],
['d', 't', '', 'l'],
['o', 's', '', ''],
['m', ' ', '', '',]

Hi, yes, you're right. I forgot to change the sample tests before publishing, so that's my bad.

I think the Kata author may have to manually change the sample tests at this point.

Sample tests have an issue in C#

MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<string, int> { {"a", 1} }, new string[] {}))
But string needs to change to object.

[Test]
public void FixedTests()
{
    Assert.AreEqual(1, Kata.MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<object, int> { { "a", 1 } }, new object[] { }));
    Assert.AreEqual(2, Kata.MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<object, int> { { "a", 1 } }, new object[] { "a" }));
    Assert.AreEqual(29, Kata.MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<object, int> { { "a", 1 }, { "b", 14 } }, new object[] { "b" }));
    Assert.AreEqual(14, Kata.MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<object, int> { { "a", 1 }, { "b", 2 }, { "c", 4 } }, new object[] { "a", "b", "c" }));
    Assert.AreEqual(23, Kata.MaxPossibleScore(new Dictionary<object, int> { { "a", 2 }, { "b", 5 }, { "c", 8 } }, new object[] { "c" }));
}

Ruby translation, please check and approve =)

It's ok already, had used return obj and return arr to check out the values.

How to check the values of arr and obj for those two tests?

I'm having the same problem and I can only see the below in output.

Expected: 99060.49926193299, instead got: 49680.66357670399
Expected: 99060.49926193299, instead got: 49680.66357670399