Very clever, well played

gg man

It depends... Nothing is completely the same.
Everything is relative

If there were additional conditions, there would be other requirements, other tests and another solution. If you have a "brilliant" idea, then make another kata and tests yourself.

I cannot agree it's the best practice and totally valid solution.
According to requirements we should return 1, 0, or -1. But 1 and True are not completely identical.

Just imagine that an output of the function is used later in such piece of code: str(same_case(a, b)).
str(True) is not the same as str(1).

It seems either requirements should be changed or tests should be updated

But it's not completely the same..

This solution is so simple, Which makes it more clever.

( 1 == 1 ) ---------> True
( 0 == 0 ) ---------> True

(True == True) OR (False == False) -----Equal-----> 1
(True == False) OR (False == True) -----Equal-----> 0

Good work

True or False is the same as 1 or 0 respectively

But wouldn't the return function return True or false instead of 1 or 0

same here

Their solution is using a ternary operator. You can find out about the syntax here.

Wouldn't think that my solution would be same as most of the people. The only thing different I did I wrapped a==b with int - for cleaner output. Cause I know that 1 == True on current test comparison