LGTM, thanks !

Seems good now, could you take a look please ?

Approved by someone

Lua fork

• removed function and parameters name from description (hopefully) resolving this issue
• used a tester function swapping expected and actual and providing inputs in assertion instead of logs
• puts random tests under a single it

fixed

expected and actual are swapped in doTest in javascript.

Yes, it is still confusing to see. Examples can easily be generalized by specifying the order as to being true / false, so the function names can be removed altogether ..

there are no per-language blocks in the description. is it really an issue ? i'm sure users are smart enough to understand that the function name used in the example is not to be taken literally and that they have to go by what is in the initial code for their language

done

Approved, thanks ! :-)

this is due to 2 conflicting annotations @Test and @RepeatedTest() on the same method.

fixed here along with better assertion messages and greatly simplifying the tests suite

Java:

Tests generate warnings -->

Mar 16, 2025 8:10:31 AM org.junit.jupiter.engine.discovery.MethodSelectorResolver resolve
WARNING: Possible configuration error: method [void SolutionTest.randomTest()] resulted in multiple TestDescriptors [org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor, org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestTemplateTestDescriptor]. This is typically the result of annotating a method with multiple competing annotations such as @Test, @RepeatedTest, @ParameterizedTest, @TestFactory, etc.

La kata (o el kata?) es muy buena! Aprendo Espanol

Thank you very much for your contribution. I wasn't expecting any external translations for this kata :P

I took a closer look at it, and I couldn't find any major flaws with it. (tho it's been a while since I touched Elixir)

Approved!

Can someone check this and approve? Thanks! (づ￣ ³￣)づ