'alr approved some time ago'

Actually at first (when these comments were posted) description said :

To be a senior, a member must be at least 55 years old and must have a handicap of greater than 8. ...

. . . then description was revised by: Brynx on Mon, Apr 6 at 7:02am UTC (Revision #6)

; ))

Where are you seeing that a senior member has a handicap of "greater than 8?" It says greater than 7, from what I see. This solution is correct.

I TOTALLY agree with the button being more prominent. I am still new to CW and I struggle to locate this button every time. Why not have this action in the same area where you bookmark the kata? The number of upvotes sits there too, but it is not clickable. Makes no sense at all. I just completed a fun kata in beta and struggled with this (again) hence me looking for an 'could be improved' comment.

WTH How did it passed??

1. Maybe they can give a tour to the new warriors(users) who just signed up on codewars.
2. They can have a option to take tour any time in their profile.

Thanks! It would be great if you could add the random values to Python as well. I never got around to figuring out how to do it.

Added Haskell. By the way, @Giacomo, there is a similar kata that asks for the longest collatz sequence length, you might enjoy that one too.

In case you might appreciate it, I just translated it into JS and Ruby with plenty of random values and could add the same on Python in few minutes.

Noticed I cut JS numeric range a bit shorter, as it has the usual double float precision limit, but the rest is the same.

In case you want to approve them, use the "+" button near the languages icon in the header, open and then green button; if you want me to add random tests to Python, just ask - I upvoted this kata even without them anyway :)

Oh, and nice to find Collatz here too; I missed it since last time on Project Euler ;)

Thanks! Great idea - I made it really clear that the get functions should take O(1) time.

Thanks! :)

I don't see any issues on that kata, it looks like it just need some more ranking feedback. Someone may have possibly changed it, though it shouldn't be possible for them to mark the kata as having an issue without leaving a comment. Where did you see that an issue was reported?