Corrected. Thank you!

Solved the problem. Thank you for reporting it.

Fixed! thanks for reporting the error.

If I publish a kata, but then it gets removed, do I lose my honor points?

I liked it. You can keep it that way. Thank you!

Done.

Ok. I will do it. ;)

I started making the changes, but then I remembered that if someone wanted to check which input was given, he could just print it on the screen.
I don't know if it is really worth it to make this change.

Ok. I will try to do that.

Not my intention to create a duplicate, sorry I didn't see that kata when I created this one. But that kata is like a more complicated version of this. The solutions of that kata could solve (with some changes in the arguments taken by the function) this kata, but the ones of this kata do not solve those of that. I have seen many katas that have this propperty on codewars.
This kata is different from that one.

What is the issue with the current one?

I have passed all the test. All but the very big ones. I'm using python, and I don't know how to solve the precision problem. Any Ideas?

If needed I wiil change the implementation

ok, I solved the wrong custom error messages. How does the assert_equals work? And how does it improve the kata?

The approximations lead to wrong output. I used the "round" function to get an int value that is closer to the real number. I get wrong answers that are close to the "real" solution because of how the approximations for this kata are done.