I don't know who made this Kata for Java, but you are a psycho! XD
I remember doing this kata in python and it was waaay easier to fix.
Java version have at least 5 times more errors! ><

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/179.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

Description uses pairs not in the normal meaning of the word pair. What is intended is two equal values.

Approved :)

Okay, I don't remember I was being told tho, but since both of em didn't have C, feel free to translate ^^

@ejini: you have been told this already: Existing duplicates is not a reason to block all the translation process. Duplicates can last years to be deduplicated, some could never be. And what if the deduplication process decides eventually to keep both? More still: this is a low level kata, and there is no C translation in any of the two katas.

It requires more work in transferring from one to another if the other one does not have specific languages in which this one had. ~~

how do translations affect the retirement process ?

C translation (author inactive)

This one or another duplicate should be retired. So please do not approve pending translations first !

Really nice kata!

Ruby 3.0 should be enabled, see this to learn how to do it

Please organize the structure of test fixture as following (although it has been mentioned in the attached link, I'm repeated here again)

describe "<This message should describe the categories of test groups inside this block>" do
  it "<A short message describing this test group>" do
    expect(...).to eq(...) #Assertions
    #Or Test.assert_equals(user_response, reference_response)
  end
end

i have the same exact code... but it gives me the "int to double is lossy" error. Im just confused at this point.

added