Haskell translation

Since other languages may not have an equivalent to Python's Decimal, I've updated the description to be a bit more language-agnostic for non-Python solutions by having the return type be a tuple of (whole, hundredths). This seems like a fair compromise that satisfies the precision for monetary values.

1. Description is incomprehensible. Examples are not explanation by themselves. https://docs.codewars.com/authoring/guidelines/description
   Why pentagram may be 5-10, if "penta" is 5? What does "5 is minimum" ever mean? Why initial value of pentagram power is 50? It is never explained? What is abbreviated by NOC? What is A-NOC?

2. User may mutate the input. https://docs.codewars.com/authoring/guidelines/submission-tests/#reference-solution

3. You run the same random test 100 times, instead of having 100 different random tests.

4. There are typos in the description, i.e. "Fox example", using word "number" instead of "digit".

• Description should explain how abacus used in this kata works (i.e. how input [100111000, 101001000, 111001000, 000000000, 110000000, 101000000] actuall results in 1203.11).
• I'd suggest some more compact form of examples in the description, maybe:

First:
    0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
 -> 1.3

The estimated difficulty seems off to me, this doesn't feel like a 5 kyu, rather a 6/7 kyu. Just my personal opinion though. I'd suggest lowering it

Give this Kata a more meaninfull name