this wont work with 0 thus the condition 1 2 3 should be only true

I think it works without number due to type coercion? At least I did almost identically without converting the string for comparison

Loooved this solution!
I'm a Jesus follower but this didn't occur to me.
I did it with sheeps though 😅
Again, loved this one!

is fuctional better performing? I assumr it's at least more readable.

I totally forgot about the chartAt() 🤦‍♂️

I put newString as bin = [] and still got it correct. I am unsure how because return "Bin" should have gotten me back an array but it was all strings so happy it worked but unsure still.

Algorithm needs to be re-thought in functional paradigm. This solution procedural.
Give functional a try....

Nice solution

This solution is incorrect as your regex doesn't match the word 'abc, it'll ignore the leading apostraphe. eg. topThreeWords("'ABC"); //=> ['abc']

you should have used regex, no offence, just tryina help out

See the fork (As u wish) 😉

unnecessary parsing to Number as >= does not compare types. If you had >== you'd need it