Inputs are not guaranteed to be output of rule 30 themselves. Closing.

Could someone here easily fix that?

Thank you, that's awesome you enjoyed it! :)

Props to the author(s), I enjoyed doing this kata (coffeescript)

Yes, this is a good point. The random function can be optimized to produce a consistent state, so it will be better. If I have time I will change it, thank you for your suggestion!

Hello! Great kata.

Just a remark: in random test, inputs that have leading or ending 0 (like [0, 1, 0 xxx 0, 0], I think this kind of input makes no sense and break the Rule 30.
Tell me if I'm wrong but row of cells should always have leading 1 or ending 1 (by only counting existing cells which make sense).

I say that because I was upset to have coded something that fit the rules but failed at something unexpected (I don't think it's mentionned in the instructions). And manage to fix it.

Cheers !

totally agree ! Damn...

I would like to see a test for empty comments, because my solution should fail for lines like "/**/".

And I suggest to change the test cases to also have comments within comments, so that "/* some text /**/ other*/" becomes "" instead of "other*/" which I think most of the current solutions would produce.

You should give an hint about the "re" module.

For a begginer, it would be easier to find how to start this Kata.