no reply after 2 yrs. closing this suggestion.anyway, there is already a hex hint in the description which i think is what was being asked for.

I don't know what digits hint you think is missing. Can you please explain what you mean with examples?

I don't understand why does solution require adding an extra day.

It would help if there was a hint about digits in description instead of tests

The description doesn't say anything about unknown players and has no sample tests for it. I made a fork that fixes that.

I got a bit stuck on false positives. There should be a test which checks if the last element in array is checked, like:

test.assert_equals(max_sequence([3, -1, 6]), 8)

Also, there is not a single example with arrays consisting of negatives. A couple of tests like this might check that:

test.assert_equals(max_sequence([-2, -3]), 0)

No need to reinvent the wheel. Using libraries or modules shouldn't be frowned upon, unless it's explicitly stated you shouldn't be using them.

You imported a module, boo

Ruby: added some random tests

JavaScript translation kumited

I enjoyed doing this kata, it is a good ruby exercise. Since I'm new to Ruby, I had to look up quite a few things in the ruby docs, but I guess I learned a bunch more Ruby again. 🙂

Enforcing regex solutions would make it seriously more challenging :-)

+1 for the random tests

Right. That would resolve the problem about hyphens and apostrophe at the same time, actually. Tho, that doesn't match the usual/common definition of "words" (irl, I mean).

I don't see problems with punctuation. Punctuation is a part of a word by the current definition.