Please feel free to use this story if this Kata is not published.
@everyone

Tkanks.

"I'm only 13", not "i'm only 13"

Thank you!I'll apply it when I'm editing harder version.

To make this just slightly harder, and maybe slightly more interesting, I would add cases where a name might appear inside other words or names (and should NOT be counted).

For example count_mentioned('Hello Sheldon·t', ['Don·t']) => [0].

Just an idea though.

Thank you!I'm not good at english because i'm only 13,sorry.

Also, I just noticed: allways should be always.
And Wraning should be Warning

Yes,Thank You!

Do you mean:

Names may be empty?

Where does he ask that? He sets up a recursive relationship with a single integer input. Would you consider factorial(x) to be a map/filter/reduce kata?

Thanks for the feedback. They're pretty random now

Thanks! now the js test cases doesn't use assert.deepEqual instead they use assert.closeTo

The issue is not the possible use of map/filter/reduce functions, but the fact that the author is asking to write a for loop mapping/filtering/reducing something.

I understand that you could use map/filter/reduce, but I don't think that is the only, or even easiest way.

It seems a bit pedantic to be marking an issue, just because certain functions/tools could be used to solve it.

Random Test is Not random enough.