Ad
  • Default User Avatar

    Ah, I see..

    I Thought that all A_n should be mappable to all B_m (not the same index)

  • Default User Avatar

    Maybe I'm reading the rules wrong, but I pass all of the fixed tests, but a lot of the random tests fail (and I cannot see why, when checking them manually)

  • Default User Avatar

    How does this random test makes sense?
    If both A and B are product types, all A's should be mappable to all B's? (which they are)

    Binding (a8 & a9 & a4 & a7 & a1) to (a0 & a8 & a3 & a2) given {(a1, a7), (a8, a9), (a4, a4), (a2, a1), (a9, a6), (a5, a3), (a8, a2), (a8, a3), (a4, a1), (a8, a7), (a3, a1), (a9, a8), (a3, a9), (a7, a0), (a2, a7), (a8, a4), (a1, a6), (a5, a9), (a8, a8), (a7, a1), (a2, a9), (a9, a7), (a9, a0), (a6, a0), (a4, a0), (a5, a6), (a7, a6), (a3, a2), (a9, a9), (a3, a7), (a7, a7), (a2, a0), (a5, a2), (a1, a2), (a9, a1), (a2, a6), (a4, a9), (a4, a3), (a7, a2), (a6, a6), (a8, a1), (a7, a8), (a2, a8), (a1, a4), (a3, a4), (a5, a7), (a1, a8), (a4, a6), (a5, a4), (a9, a4), (a4, a8), (a2, a3), (a6, a7), (a8, a0), (a5, a0), (a6, a3), (a2, a5), (a9, a3), (a8, a6), (a6, a9), (a1, a0), (a6, a5), (a7, a9), (a9, a5), (a7, a3), (a1, a5), (a4, a2), (a9, a2), (a1, a9), (a6, a2), (a5, a5), (a3, a0), (a3, a5), (a2, a2), (a5, a1), (a2, a4), (a3, a3), (a6, a8), (a1, a1), (a4, a5), (a6, a4), (a5, a8), (a7, a4), (a3, a6), (a3, a8), (a6, a1), (a7, a5), (a1, a3), (a8, a5), (a4, a7)}: True should equal False
    
  • Default User Avatar

    The random tests in Python seem broken.

    Sometimes they pass, and sometimes they are all over the place...

  • Default User Avatar

    The Python random tests seem broken.

    For instance for input ['pad', 'tri', 'tri', 'pel', 'fib', 'fib', 'tet'] 8

    It says [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0] should equal [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]

    Somehow the first number pad(0) is 0 instead of 1??

  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution