Ad
  • Default User Avatar

    Example ((a != b) > c != d) < e < f can be rewritten as a != b && b > c && c != d && d < e && e < f. Operator != isn't special, it's like any other operator.

  • Default User Avatar

    What is the expectation of the mentioned example in the description: ((a != b) > c != d) < e < f
    Let's assume a,b,c,d,e,f distinct numbers greater than 1. Should then (a != b) be true, (true (1) > c) be false, (false (0) != d) be true, (true (1) < e) be true ?
    Then (under the given assumptions) the expression would break down to (e < f)

    I feel like I'm failing at the random tests that use the != operator. So I'm wondering if my assumption above is correct.

  • Custom User Avatar
  • Default User Avatar

    Same error here... when will be fixed?

  • Custom User Avatar

    i have same question with you ,how do you solve this problem?

  • Default User Avatar

    Thank you for your answer!
    My bad. I was not aware that a test is actually a test group. Can I delete this somehow, such that it is not listed under issues any longer?

  • Default User Avatar

    There are already numbers like 10**23, so if there were some useful tests missing with numbers less than that, they could be added. I don't see any major problems with the tests though. The values of m above are floating point numbers instead of integers, so I'm not sure what you suggest.

  • Default User Avatar

    The group called "test6" has 7 tests, it must have been different tests that failed.

  • Default User Avatar

    C++ 14:
    First, I had a bug such that test case 6 failed, saying expected 45001, actual -1.

    When I fixed the bug, test case 6 failed again, saying expected -1, actual 45001.

    Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug in the testcase?