Funny concept, well done.

python new test framework

The test is very weak; there are no actual random tests except one test with randomized parameters, so it's easy to specifically pattern match against it (considering that the operations are very easy to notice, this is not very hard).

There is a issue with random test when the string starts with h.
According to the description, it should be all caps when the input string starts with h.

But the following input string failed when the output is all caps

hcUR72Dm6xdSaNjoz Y6xFXqx 4 1Qu M TpC

The test expected this: OMG HCUR72DM6XDZANJOZ Y6xFXqx 4 1Qu M TpC but as I said, according to the description it should be like this: OMG HCUR72DM6XDZANJOZ Y6XFXQX 4 1QU M TPC

Javascript should have a wider test coverage to invalide this solution with an incorrect word length count.

thanks

it's a CW glitch, I can see it from the discourse but not inside the translation, anyhow approved ~~

EDIT: see comment above

Verify now please, I used the alternative proposed random test case method instead of tuples.

Good observation. This is the way the framework displays tuples (string, string). I'm not sure whether this inconsistency between fixed and random test layout is an issue. @Hobovsky, what do you think?

The random test output is not as expected, it's missing the "" and uses () instead, not sure why since Im not familiar with C#

TL;DS

I have read the instructions several times now, and for me it seems like when referring to the length of the string (the 32 limit) it should include exclamation marks initially in the string. My understanding does not seem correct when I fail the tests. Is it only me that have this problem? If not maybe it is an idea to clarify this in the instructions?

Poor task description. It took too long to write the C # code that passed all the tests.