Python fork: minor description changes

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/6693554e4a917aa88036db35

Pretty nice kata, got a kick of difficulty to it

Also, hello fellow rice farmer!

Way too easy, but hey, free score is free score

I came back to this kata after 4 years

Amazing

Description should be more specific on the expected output?

Like should be there any rounding or what?

Challenging but fun and also surprisingly simple

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/665c22668c1787eb68874920

New fork

glovastefan It can be called a translation, a fork or a kumite, whichever you want to call it

Still, because the description was edited after I wrote this fork, it is causing a conflict and therefore can't be merged..

I suppose you could copy the description, sample and random test cases in your kata then reject this fork.

I will be back in around a week since I'm quite busy right now

Sorry for the late response, I was really busy and I also kinda rushed while reporting the issue..

I will get back in a week or something

Edit: and yeah.. honestly my solution is completely unreadable and my issue is missing key informations..

Possible duplicate? https://www.codewars.com/kata/525f4206b73515bffb000b21

Possible duplicate? https://www.codewars.com/kata/5324945e2ece5e1f32000370

Duplicate: https://www.codewars.com/kata/530e15517bc88ac656000716

"The one you linked is deciphering it, this one is encoding it, they're not the same."

...yes they are?
eg:

decode: "ABCD" -> "NOPQ"
encode: "ABCD" -> "NOPQ"

The encode function is exactly the same as the decode one..

In your description, it is an invalid postcode, I have written a fork that modified several aspects of the description: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/6651f949518267bb7e1236c1