don't lose your time on this user, they are not legit (and got entraped)

Your first kata was retired, and this one will be as well. Once a kata receives too many negative votes, it's automatically retired. Why the negative votes? Hard to say. It could be because the kata lacks novelty (i.e. it's been done many, many times before), it's a duplicate (or near duplicate) of another kata, it lacks quality, it's too easy or too hard, it's too confusing to understand, it's culturally or ehtically inflammatory, etc. Not saying any of these are the case, but if both katas get retired, you might want to think of a new idea.

It was retired automatically after receiving 4 non-satisfied votes. Please read this for further information.

If you want to author again in the future, I suggest you visit the Discord server and get feedback before publishing your kata, to avoid a quick retirement again. You can share the link to your kata there while it is still in Draft status.

My god, now i must re-create kata?

How to ban you?

@hobovsky Why it is retired too? I am tryed re-publish

@Kacarott Thank you

@TheBigPiggingPig

You can resolve issues by clicking the "mark as closed" checkbox when replying to the issue thread.

.

Remove this issue, I've fixed it, if you don't I'll report the issue for interfering with normal operation!

How to close your issue?

And... I opened this issue just on the moment it got retired so you can't really edit it anyway. Just take this as evaluation for your next attempt on kata creation.

• Why that many random tests? (currently it's 500)
• You're using JS syntaxes that is considered deprecated / bad practice (the use of vars, String.prototype.substring instead of String.prototype.slice)
• You didn't add corner cases like the number and/or factor being 0 or array being empty (and your result will fail this one also)

Exactly. You are misinterpreting the error message. "Expected 2 to equal 0" means "I got a 2 but it should have been a 0", i.e. you produced the 2.
If you promise me a dog, but you give me a cat, I'd say "I expected the cat to be a dog".
Not an issue.

Test case has issue

expected your code to be in Lambda Calculus form

offending line: "add = m => n => f => x => m(f)(n(f)(x))"