Approved.
right, well noticed
If you test something in the sample tests, you should also test it in the fixed Tests. Actually I would remove 17 and 20 from the sample tests and only test this in the fixed tests.
I did it with n=17 because this is the sample of the other languages. But I changed it to n=20 :)
Sample tests test for n=17 but random tests only test up to n=16. Also n=20 is possible without overflowing long range.
n=17
n=16
n=20
long
Why StringBuffer instead of StringBuilder?
StringBuilder in this case is probably more performative, right?!
Great Solution,
I would include the locale, otherwise, the result could be in another language.
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("LLLL, d").withLocale(Locale.US).format(LocalDate.ofYearDay(isLeap ? 2020 : 2021, day))
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Loading collection data...
Approved.
right, well noticed
If you test something in the sample tests, you should also test it in the fixed Tests. Actually I would remove 17 and 20 from the sample tests and only test this in the fixed tests.
I did it with n=17 because this is the sample of the other languages. But I changed it to n=20 :)
Sample tests test for
n=17but random tests only test up ton=16. Alson=20is possible without overflowinglongrange.Why StringBuffer instead of StringBuilder?
StringBuilder in this case is probably more performative, right?!
Great Solution,
I would include the locale, otherwise, the result could be in another language.
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("LLLL, d").withLocale(Locale.US).format(LocalDate.ofYearDay(isLeap ? 2020 : 2021, day))
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution