Approved.

write a function solve(n, bound)

Don't know if that was there when you raised this, but it's there now. Closing.

Just4FunCoder fork approved by someone.

Time for using lower: 1.2828872501850128
Time for using in: 1.0886021964251995

I ran the tests a few times, and it seems using in is more time effective, but the difference is negligible.

approved

Approved latest fork which fixes this issue

CodeWars still uses PHPUnit 9.x, maybe this will help.

I see them aswell. Closing...

Done :)

Ideally, it should be the other way round: examples should be expressed in a way which does not depend on a presented language, do not include language-specific names, and only present domain-specific information. This way, we will avoid multitude of language-specific blocks which lead to merge conflicts.

Hello, TimoNotThy, this is a test. I am trying lern how work this website.
I don't know, how this available for you =(

No changes can be made here because this fork was already approved 8 days ago.

Better create another fork for this.

(Weird that I didn't get a notification)

Just trying to follow closer to the other translations.

Sorry I had to fork this one because it is difficult for me to make the necessary changes otherwise.

In short:

• Added 10 big array tests

• Used a faster reference solution that solves this kata in $O(n)$ time rather than $O(n^2)$ time (despite not being a performance kata, actually slower algo will still works)

• Simplified random matrix generation, excluding number 0 in the range

In case you are wondering, the honor points still go fully to the original author (you) 😉

Approved - Thanks for everyone who is translating my Kata to new languages.

Wow thanks my guy! Multiple translations of this my little Kata - Rust, your Python and PHP.