Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    I agree with Unnamed, it's wishful thinking in this situation, to have a different input.

  • Custom User Avatar

    the old name from the setup remained, I fixed it

  • Custom User Avatar

    Ok, so let it be 500,010, alright @FArekkusu?

  • Custom User Avatar

    Ah man, I forgot it to remove.
    Thanks for the intervention!

  • Custom User Avatar

    Alright, I reused your code for tests and change the assumptions so you get the number as an output
    instead of an array. So @JohanWiltink and @KanKamau thank you for the cooperation.
    I'm going to implement the ruby version for this Kata. Now it's unpublished.
    Thanks again!

  • Custom User Avatar

    that's the solution, thanks!

  • Custom User Avatar

    Johan and Ken, thanks, I'll do it this way, we don't wan't the servers to burn.
    I merge our Katas in my way, so the implementation will be better and the users will have more fun.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    ok

  • Custom User Avatar

    ALSO, the input validation is a terrible idea, and should be removed.

    please provide best reasons you can

    not resolved, accidentally marked (why is it marked by default?)

  • Custom User Avatar

    done :-)

  • Custom User Avatar

    thanks, I removed it!

  • Custom User Avatar

    resolved

  • Custom User Avatar

    also, why bother testing negative numbers at all?!
    I got a comment that required this

  • Custom User Avatar

    thanks for reporting. I fixed this for JS

  • Loading more items...