You can tell this is a good one because I'm unsatisfied with my solution, and I keep refactoring it. Sorry for the multiple submissions!

@TureNoobMan

If you arent comfortable with C++, then you can wait for someone else to review it. Better to not blindly approve translations if you arent able to review them properly.

Do I need to take care of anything

What do you mean?

.

Nice change, already merged

Who will approve the translation

C++ translation is ready for review

Hey, I'm writing a C++ translation, and I've noticed that the reference solution in your Python code is actually unnecessary. Also, I've simplified the loop a bit. I've published a fork, you can merge it if you like these changes

Added "if original text can be seen in the hole" to the description.

Modified description

Has been modified

Also, this kata

Tests are susceptible to mutation of input: https://www.codewars.com/kata/reviews/62b0457285f66b000196305c/groups/62b048c9e62c9e0001f3e50d

Hi,

• The tests are far too much heavy, far a simple task lieke this. A runtime of 2-3s should be the max needed, definitely not 10-11s ;)
• As hobovsky pointed out, sort of, the description is lacking actual, complete specification (rather than relying on examples)
• it's not sepcified what to do about the case of the letters (in the decoded text, as well as: "should we match a F when the top left corner of the card is f?")
• the order inwhich the chars are handled should be clearly specified as well (I mean: what is the order of the decoded characters if two matching positions are overlapping the, like "...ff..." in the ciphered text when the f is the haracter in the top corner of the card)

There is nothing really new about the task itself, but the context is rather nice.

Cheers