The statement is confusing, the situations that must be considered are not exemplified correctly. It contributes little considering the time it took me to reach the correct solution

This issue has been fixed by author, closing

The wind will pass through each card house from left to right

Wind doesn't go through buildings

Please make up your mind.

Added.Thanks for feedback!

Specs about behavior of wind in case its strength is equal to that of next house are missing from description. We need to scrape comment section to find out.

I can't find that statement anywhere in the specification of the kata.

why isn't this logged as issue? ah wait, it is discussed in other comments

probably same issue:

min_wind_strength([13, 481, 430, 205, 154, 719, 138, 773, 53, 331, 951])

expected: 774
my sol: 719 

Looks like they've been removed

Looks like there have been an error in my code. Thanks for feedback! Fixed

Tag binary search is not needed anymore as reference solution has since changed to a different algorithm.

Array size is at most 50. Why is there a optimization tag?

Reference solution fails when the tallest building has more than one occurrence:

Testing for min_wind_strength([877, 517, 66, 828, 484, 5, 83, 763, 570, 233, 202, 991, 855, 991, 848, 829])
992 should equal 993

The highest building is 991, so 992 will topple every building. This is a trivial upper bound.

Wind doesn't go through buildings. When a house breaks, it “stays in place” and therefore it takes + wind to knock it down so the wind can pass through.

Could you explain this test?

test.assert_equals(min_wind_strength([9, 8, 7, 6, 5]), 10)

Why isn't a wind strength of 9 sufficient?

A wind with strength of 9 is enough to collapse the first house. It doesn't matter that the first house does not fall onto the second house because the wind is already stronger than all the remaining houses.

Fixed