// ==================== \\
|| Manually Notification ||
\\ ==================== //

Please view the post above

Well, according to the current suite, i guess one will pass the random part if they pass the others.
But at least you can show how the iterator is constructed.

t6_should_allow_arbitrary_iterator_nesting
Test Passed
Arbitrarily-nested iterator: 144 should equal 303

This message does not help for debugging

Interesting, this case is so rare, well, normally it would be a+(b>c) or a<b|c<d, that my brain never registered it in the searching path...
THX for revealing it

Glad that you had fun here o_O

@MikChan
So you currently timeout no matter how many times you try submit? How about the sample tests? Or empty the test code to see how long does it take to compile.
Maybe you could raise an issue on github and PM your code to CW maintainer to investigate the bottleneck

9E9 is 9 * 10 ** 9
For this specified problem, it means a effectively large number, in order to ignore the first sum from the beginning of the input
Could also be -float('inf') but this one is shorter and enough for all test cases

~it == -it - 1
~-it == it - 1
-~it == it + 1

These equations hold for integers

04:12 04:42 30
['Half an hour until Moon Rise!', 'Moon Rise!'] should equal ['04:12', 'Moon Rise!']

08:29 08:29 40
['Moon Rise!'] should equal ['08:29']

[0.13, 0.18, 0.69, -0.09]
['A', 'B', 'C'] should equal ['A', 'C', 'B']

The order is not defined for parties with the same vote

Should i say that i am in the situation where the ranking automatically disappare in few minutes
Not knowing is it a feature or bug

Fixed.

Is that intended?

Well, this behaviour follows the original shell version