I updated the kata with @mlabrum's setup to disable the ** operator. I also made the description clearer.
Could you tell me if this is satisfactory?
Sorry for the laaaaate answer...
I am actually trying to add it to the "Preloaded" section and I get this runtime error: RuntimeError: Preloaded code failed to run. Exception = Undefined method ** for class 'Object'
Isn't the "Solution Setup" meant to be what the warrior will see when starting the training?
Thanks for your feedback. I added some precisions to the Kata's description. Still one issue though, I haven't been able to properly disable the ** operator. Could you help?
@bkaes, I call genius!
Preloaded code has been added, Kata is fixed now and I hope it will be published!
Thanks @bkaes
@GiacomoSorbi, the links have been fixed in the description. Thanks for pointing it ou.
Still no clues on how to correctly disable the
**
operator.I updated the Exponent Method Kata URL though.
I updated the kata with @mlabrum's setup to disable the
**
operator. I also made the description clearer.Could you tell me if this is satisfactory?
Sorry for the laaaaate answer...
Hi @Detry322
I am actually trying to add it to the "Preloaded" section and I get this runtime error:
RuntimeError: Preloaded code failed to run. Exception = Undefined method ** for class 'Object'
Isn't the "Solution Setup" meant to be what the warrior will see when starting the training?
Hi @Detry322,
Yes I am aware of that. I am not a Ruby master and I couldn't find a way to properly disable it. That's also why this is still in Beta.
Do you by any chance, know how to do it?
Thank you for your feedback.
Hi @craecke,
Quick question: how did you manage to disable the
**
operator.I need to do the same.
Thanks,
Well, not much but thanks for the input anyway. I will ask the author of
Exponent method
how he did it.Hi @mlabrum,
Thanks for your feedback. I added some precisions to the Kata's description. Still one issue though, I haven't been able to properly disable the
**
operator. Could you help?I did this one in Ruby, basically using the
reverse
method. Is this also considered a naive answer?