Added. Thank you very much.

Fixed now. Thank you very much.

Should it be mentioned that the function is pure or am I missing something?

Nice Kata! Suggestion to add tag PERFOMANCE

Sure, I'll update it to Python once the improved random tests in C++ are done by the author.

Perhaps you should generate more variation in random tests. I would try to include patterns from each of the fixed test batches.

Nope, I will add it if needed.

Did you prohibit some modules in Python?

Thank you for translation.

• Python translation

• performance tag could be used

Thank you very much!!!

Dude!!!
Very nice kata.. Had to take a paper and a pen on this one :-)

In addition, the lambda used in this kata does not use [=] and does not capture n.

I'm sorry I didn't understand your question. My guess is that you may have made some mistakes in your understanding of the way the online judging is conducted:
In fact, multiple sets of judging on Codewars are more similar to Leetcode, not passing arguments through I/O, but directly by calling the submitted function (or TypeTrait, etc.), so that Non-local initialization is only performed before judging. You might be able to move the definition of traw to the body of the calc function?

c++, the [=] labda you are using to check results is holding on to the "result" (quptation marks because its capturing the starting n too lmao) of every test and adding it to the user's answer. Below is my function.

Also why are you even using lambda when it has no purpose whatsoever in the kata?