It's hard to reply this. Because im in the same place as you. The last one fails for me. I digged a little bit and I ploted into a scatter graph, but it makes me more disappointed (at least for me) because seems like there are not visible clusters there.

You can print things to console. Here's an example in Python: https://docs.codewars.com/training/troubleshooting/#print-input

My solution passed all the tests except the final one. Could you tell me what's in it. I can't figure out what I didn't look at in my solution.

You have wrong negative test cases on Go. Some values in your cases are not negative. Please fix it

Verifying that fib(-91) == 4660046610375530309
Expected
<*big.Int | 0xc00056da40>: {
neg: true,
abs: [4660046610375530309],
}
to equal
<*big.Int | 0xc000023140>: {
neg: false,
abs: [4660046610375530309],
}

Took me a minute to understand the question, but the test values helped. The values are:

• n - number of eggs available
• m - number of drops possible (any more would cause his heart to break)

So for example if the values were n = 1, m = 100, the answer would be 100. Just start dropping
your one egg at floor 1 and continue up until it either breaks or you run out of tries. So you can
give the exact number for any floor up to 100. The actual floor might be 2000, but you can only verify up
to 100 with one egg. If you start on any other number, for example floor 2, the egg might break. Then
you know that floor 2 isn't safe, but you aren't sure if floor 1 is safe or not, so you can't
give a correct answer.

Whether there is an issue or not, this isn't the way to describe it.

Which language? Which random test? What's the issue with it?

Oh right, none of that is provided, so... closing.

so you're saying there's no issue?

I have a problem with random test
My code work with all values

One of the fast solutions