I think this kata needs to be clearer on the ordering of the borrows and where exactly the rounding is applied. I tried a number of possibilities but haven't cracked it yet. Please do not require the kata solvers to be mind readers.

I wanted users not to bother calculating the amount of 0.000001, so I gave it to round up to 10, I still have a low rank in javascript, so I could be wrong in some places

And then the reference solution also rounds the number by nearest integer before rounding by nearest 10?

WTF??????

Simply put this kata is nonsensical. Voting this "Somewhat satisfied" is an insult to everyone having to actually solve the kata.

The initial test was (accidently) ordered as the reverse list of those that have spent most giving to those that required most. Except for reversing that list, it was intuitive. Perhaps such processing should be requested.

Annnnnnd... the reference solution iterates through the input object keys and use that as the order.

Wut?

Then the input is ill-suited for the kata; object keys are not supposed to be logically ordered. The input should be a list of key-values instead.

You have to decide who owes whom, how much?

How is this the task? The kata doesn't mention the order of which the borrowing happens.

Duplicate issue

Resolved

Added

Check it)

You don't explain how floating point numbers should be converted to integers.

Take it, my first kata, learning how to do it, thank you)

done

More sample tests and fixed tests needed

You should take down this kata (put in Draft) until you have random tests.