Please review and approve Dart traslation.

The Dart translation has been published. Please review and approve.

Thank you for reviewing that.

Right you are! Updated: fixed basic tests and updated rundom tests.

Please review and approve: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/657ee1f1b5a5150024c181e2?sel=658fe5c9dc80170a4c4dcb15

You are ablsolutelly correct @IThinkThatsKirby. Nonetheless, the goal of the Codewars project is not to teach that or another language (AFAIU from ToC), but to give a platform. You are right, some warriors provide comments to their solutions, however that's not the rule.
In case you are eager to find explanetions to solutions, you might google it. There are some on YouTube, GitHub, dev.to, etc.
At least, I put my point of view at this topic.

Would you please be so kind to eleborate your stayement, namely "where [is the] documentation."?
I am not absolutely sure that I am clearly understand you.

I have reviewed your changes and realy astonished. Thanks that taught me a lot.

Nonetheless, I do understand why that matters and why did you provide these.

On the one hand, I honestly have no idea why one wants to "hack" a kata as one can freely google the solution or have 2 accounts and review solutions directly w/o spoiling one's points. On the other, I frankly do not understand, for what reason one why might want to "hack" a kata as codewars never offers any benefit. Why???

Thank you for the detailed code review! 🤗

Please review this fork https://www.codewars.com/kumite/62b37319acf409002853d3c6?sel=62bbfda410c5fe00308ba2de

You are absolutely right. I overlooked that point in the description.

Here are updated random tests https://www.codewars.com/kumite/611df6330e4757003e4473e2?sel=62b37319acf409002853d3c6

These are old tests. Not sure why.
This fork contains updated random tests but diff doesn't show it - forked

I have updated random tests generator to make it respects all four requrements.

Hi. I looked through the Discourse section and found only that "random tests are broken". I tried several other codewarior's solutions for this translation but all of them pass randpm tests. I reviewed the description (it is shared across languages) and sample testcases for other languages and didn't find issues with this translation.
Could you please unpublish my translation so someone else can propose a new better one?

Right you are. I'll be more thoughtful in the future. Thanks for pointing that out.