python new test frameworks

Hi! I noticed that in your answer you also converted the letter z to s, although I see no reason for this. I think the mistake is in this.

The original sequence: jdtqzbq
Correct sequence after conversion: jdtpzbq
And the sum of the letters: 0 + -2 + 0 + 3 + -1 + 2 + -3 => -1, therefore Right side wins

I hope I helped you figure it out.

It seems you've missed that part in the description:

Tim also asked you to make sure that if class name is empty, it should be None as result, and to make possible to call function without second parameter.

And please use the spoiler flag next time you post code.

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

Thanks! I totally understand your reasoning and that's generally true that function's signature should be enough, but I am the case where full definition is useful as I'm writing that in IDE. I wrote that definition on my own which was working till some point, and this map(|n| Box::new(n)) was missing.

Thanks again, I really appreciate that!

Yes, the description is complete. You don't need to see the source (i.e. the body of the function) to understand what it does: it returns a TreeNode. All it does is abstract away the Box for you. I could post the code here, but frankly I think you're better served understand and accepting why this isn't necessary. If you look at the official documentation for any type, you'll notice that only the signature of methods is given, because that's all you need to know to work with it.

EDIT:

I've since realised that the reason one might want to see the full implementation is to use this locally in your IDE. My bad. I've updated the description to show the full implementation now.

Thanks for providing Rust translation.

Is that description complete?

impl TreeNode {
    /// Use this so you need not concern yourself with Boxing
    pub fn new(value: i32, left: Option<TreeNode>, right: Option<TreeNode>) -> Self
}

Any chances to have it provided in full shape?

Hi, that' wholesome set of Katas, thanks!

I am getting some issue in Rust, with random tests.
Let's see "jdtqzbq". After wololoing, that should be jdtpsbq, right? Because d between j and t is not changed, and then q just after t is changed to p. So we have 0 -2 0 3 1 2 -3, which reduces to 1 which says that Left won. But expected is Right side wins.
Am I doing something wrong on any step or something's wrong with calculating expected values?

I think this one is a little harder than 5th kyu, very nice one.

It looks short and cool, but it works very slowly, because of brute force and sort :(

python 2 only

Thank you for the information from the article you bring. I also found a website that also has a lot of useful information https://learnshareit.com/python-tutorial/ that everyone can refer.

the new function must be a generator

Nope, the check_yield is completely broken.

You can use inspect.isgeneratorfunction.